What typically occurs during the judicial review process involving 'strict scrutiny'?

During the judicial review process involving strict scrutiny, the government must demonstrate that its interest in enacting a law is compelling. This level of scrutiny is applied particularly in cases involving fundamental rights or suspect classifications, such as race or religion. Under strict scrutiny, the court will closely examine the law to ensure that the government's objectives are not only important but necessary to achieve a significant public interest.

For a law to withstand this rigorous examination, it must also be narrowly tailored and employ the least restrictive means possible to achieve its goals. This high standard is intended to protect individual rights and limit government overreach, ensuring that any infringement on rights is justified by a substantial and compelling reason.